This Page Last Updated: November 1, 2010
DID TAO YUENMING FIRST USE "PENZAI"?
|
|
|
REMBRANDT & BONSAI?
"[T]here is a painting by Rembrandt van Rijn, dated c.1665, variously titled The Bridal Couple, Ruth and Boaz or The Jewish Bride, which appears to depict a bonsai in an Amsterdam garden. "The painting shows a couple standing outdoors before a wall. (Their garb is apparently contemporary Dutch.) On the right, in a niche in the wall, is what could be a twin-trunk tree with flowering ground cover planted in an unglazed, square (or rectangular), brown container with a lip and cloud feet. On the left, there is a hanging planter, and, beneath that, some plants in a round, straight-sided, three-footed, ceramic pot. Both the container in the niche and the one on the ground seem unlike European pottery of the 17th century or earlier. "By the 1660's, the Dutch had been trading heavily with several areas in the Orient for approximately a century, and had an exclusive (European) trading agreement with the Japanese government, dating from 1641, to use the port of Nagasaki. It is, therefore, quite possible that dwarfed trees in pots from China and/or Japan were included in the cargoes the traders brought home. "The reason for the uncertainty about the contents of the picture is Rembrandt's chiaroscuro style. He focuses most of the light on the main subjects, and leaves surrounding items in relative obscurity. Consequently, it is difficult to determine with assurance from color reproductions exactly what is being portrayed in the background. However, the apparent bonsai pot, plus the ready access to all manner of Oriental goods, coupled with the Dutch interest in exotic plant forms, while not dispositive, strongly suggest that the plant in the niche is a seventeenth century bonsai.
"The painting is in the collection of
the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam..."
As it turns out, a co-worker of RJB just
so happened to be going to Amsterdam in late July of 2002 as part of a
European vacation. She took with her a copy of the above article
and a b&w photo of the painting after receiving a crash course in bonsai.
She and her family were able to inspect the actual painting at the Rikjmuseum
and returned with a quality postcard from that establishment. This
reproduction measures 4-1/8 x 5-13/16" [10.4 x 14.7 cm]. Scanned
and pasted below, it shows even more detail than one can see in either
of two coffee-table-sized library books reviewed of the artist's works.
The subject tree portion of the above, plus three manipulations by RJB of the lighting to emphasize the plant and pot, are shown below.
The actual canvas painting
measures 48 x 65-1/2" (121.5 x 166.5 cm)-- no small work. "As far
as is known, the first mention of this picture is in the seventh volume
of John Smith's
Catalogue Raisonné... (London, 1834; item
430), where it is called 'The Birth-day Salutation.' Smith ...praises
the painting extravagantly and says he bought it in 1825 from 'Mr. Vaillant'
of Amsterdam for five thousand guilders. In 1833 he sold it for 6825
guilders to the Amsterdam collector Adriaan van der Hoop... Of the
biblical figures suggested as the subjects, Isaac and Rebekah or Jacob
and Rachel seem the most likely. The identification with the first-named
rests upon a drawing [pen and bistre, approx. 5-3/4 x 7-3/8" (14.5 x 18.5
cm)], presumably dating from about 1655, in which Isaac and Rebekah are
spied upon by King Abimelech."
POSSIBLE EXPLANATION AFTER ANOTHER VIEWING? The "pot" is actually the top portion of a
deeper vessel. The "bottom" of the alleged bonsai container is actually a decorative edge for a tall vessel which
continues to narrow below this "bottom" and descends into deeper shadow. This taller pot rests on a surface that visually
seems to be about where the right-hand edge of the woman's red dress folds sharply down to the left and also in line with the tip of her right
small finger (pinkie). The container's bottom might be in line with the top edge of her right hand. The four partial sections,
including three light-manipulated pictures, below the full image, thus, do not include the actual lower portion of the container. As an additional tease, RJB has come upon a portrait from the same era by a lesser Dutch artist of a burgher and his Eurasian wife. Jacob Jansz Coeman actively painted in 1651-1676, from 1663 until the end of his life he was active in Batavia (Indonesia). Pieter Cnoll & family (1665, currently also in the Rijksmuseum) shows the subject with a half Japanese wife. The detail of the work as shown does not have any other remarkable features. The full picture is being sought. NOTES
Haak, Bob
Rembrandt His Life, His Work, His Times
(New York: Harry N. Abrams, Inc.; 1969.
Translated from the Dutch by Elizabeth Willems-Treeman), pp. 320-322, from
whence came the above quote. Color on pg. 320; b&w of the drawing
on pg. 322. On pg. 334 Haak also states "At last Rembrandt's art
reached its ultimate perfection in the one picture which I place at the
very pinnacle of his art:
The Bridal Couple." Although the
late date of discovery of this work might raise some concern, the fact
the both the Rikjmuseum and various authors accept this fine work into
Rembrandt's opus seems to settle any question of its authenticity.
Besides, if a forger was to have produced such a celebrated work, that
person surely must have left some other proof that his/her talents vied
with the Dutch master's best!
|
DWARF TREE UNDERSTANDING, EUROPE 1700s?
Was there detailed knowledge circulating in Europe in the early 1700s of how to dwarf trees prior to the introduction of dwarf potted trees? The following newsgroup post (brought to RJB's attention by John Romano and reprinted verbatim) suggests this:
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000
18:46:05 +0100
Hi all, Deo Aglibut, a member of the Bonsai Club Tirol has found a most remarkable book. It was written in 1725 by a guy called George Liegelsteiner, who was the court gardener of the Archbishop of Salzburg, Austria. He writes about dwarfing trees so that they look like a very beautiful big tree, but only much smaller. He understands tree physiology like only a small minority of bonsai enthusiasts today. He explains in detail how to shorten roots and transplant trees often, how to shorten branches, how to correct a onesided tree. He explaines how to cut back a tree to a stump, let the new shoots grow, cut them back at strategic points, let the newt shoots grow again and cut them back It is exactly the "Chinese" clip and grow technique. He makes drawings which explian the development of a dwarf-tree in a way that could not be improved. Unfortunately he does not mention ever whether the trees are situated in any containers or in the field. This point does not seem to be of interest to him. So to purists it is not an early European bonsai book. To me it is. I think the history of bonsai in Europe has to be rewritten. In the next issue of the German bonsai magazine there will be an article with pictures about it. Here the text of the title page (in poor English translation): "George Liegelsteiner's court gardener at the Archbishops in Salzburg, well examined DWARF-TREE, or thorough education, how the dwarf-trees are recognized at their roots and branches, yearly cut back, grown again on the other hand, with many fruits which taste better, and how rotten trees can be brougt back into good shape. Frankfurt and Leipzig 1725". best regards
Walter Pall
The following was later similarly posted by Jim Lewis:
From: "John Lane" <johnlatasherbooks.com>
I am not a member of your list, but thought the following might be of interest to your members. Perhaps you could post it. I am no Bonsai specialist, but as a bibliographer at Asher Rare Books in IJmuiden, The Netherlands, I researched George Liegelsteiner's Wohlgezogener Zwerg-Baum and ran across the comments Walter Pall made about this book on your list in 2000 (and references to his article in Bonsai Magazine, no. 3, pp. 38-39). His comments on the text are far more informative than anything I could say, but I can add some information on the history of the book and author that may be of interest to members of the Bonsai Club. As Walter Pall noted, Liegelsteiner was (by 1725) official gardener to the court of Count Franz Anton Harrach (1665-1727), Archbishop of Salzburg. But he first published his book even earlier: in Frankfurt am Main in 1702! I have personally examined only the editions of 1725 and 1747, but I give a list of editions (all octavo) with what information I have found: date, place of publication (publisher): pagination + illustrations.
1702 Frankfurt am Main (J. M. Bencard): (7), '324' [= 124] pp., no information
on illustrations.
The author was certainly still alive in 1716, and apparently still in 1725, so these editions may have been revised by him (those of 1703 and 1704 may be unauthorized pirated editions). He apparently died before 1747, but the edition published in that year has a new appendix on improving poor soil and enhancing wood growth, as well as a new nine-page 'Vorrede' by an unidentified hortophile giving new and interesting information about the introduction of the cultivation of dwarf trees into Europe. It indicates that the practice came to the gardens of Versailles from Asia [sic] in the late seventeenth century, and names people involved in spreading the knowledge to Germany, including Liegelsteiner.
copy of the 1725 edition is currently available from Asher Rare Books
(Euro 1250).
John A. Lane (per http://home.ease.lsoft.com/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0310&L=bonsai&T=0&F=&S=&P=41857 )
Can it be shown that anyone made use
of this information nearly three centuries ago with container plants?
Or, ideally, cared for an imported dwarf potted tree using this book?
Was there an article with pictures subsequently published?
|
NOT ALL FILM DEPICTIONS... + QUEEN HATSEPSUT
Not all film depictions of dwarf potted trees are the same. These would generally be plants under 4' in height, in a relatively shallow container, appearing shaped in one of the naturalistic tree styles, and presented in an Asiatic location or decor after approximately the first century C.E. One cinematic portrayal which would otherwise meet the criteria is the 1956 Paramount Pictures film The Ten Commandments. This Cecille B. DeMille biblical epic includes a scene which we would include in Boldly Grow -- if the time-frame of the story was not 15th or 13th century B.C.E. and the location not ancient Egypt. In the scene where the Pharoah Sethi (Sir Cedric Hardwicke) is playing a game of hounds and jackels with Nefretiri (Anne Baxter), a perhaps 3' tall woody-trunked tree planted in a white woven-basket-like container with corner peg feet is visible down the hallway. Apparently just a few feet from an open balcony/window area, the dark wood shows dark green foliage -- not particularly shaped, but the top growth is like a desert bush on a distinctive single-trunked tree. (No, the bush is not burning...) Behind Sethi is then seen the branches and foliage of a similar dwarf potted tree; its white color pot is briefly visible at the end of the scene. The first specimen is visible in most of the scene. Released in the U.S. on October 5, this movie is not held to be completely historically accurate. While we know for certain that palm trees were trimmed by the Egyptians and other peoples of the desert, it does seem within the realm of possibility that some desert plants could have been containerized for decor. Now, there is the historical fact that thirty-one young myrrh trees were transported in soil-filled wicker baskets from the fabulous land of Punt on the Somali Coast up north to Egypt for Queen Hatshepsut 's royal garden. The queen is believed to have lived c.1502 - 1452 B.C.E. Long sea trips were apparently so rare that the visit to Punt along the coast of the Red Sea, with the fleet needing never to be out of sight of land, was commemorated. The recording of this event in her mortuary temple complex is evidence of its importance at the time, the keeping of these rare fragrant trees whose resin would perpetually be available for the gods. The first expedition to Punt had taken place (apparently without returning plants) some six and a half centuries before Hatshepsut; similar expeditions would continue during the three centuries that followed her reign. Her five large and gift-laden ships sailed down the Nile to the Delta, through a pioneer canal cut connecting to the Gulf of Suez, and then down the coast. They returned two years later bearing the trees, lumps of myrrh resin gum, cinnamon wood, monkeys, dogs, a live panther, panther and leopard skins, much gold, baskets, more than three thousand small cattle, a cheetah or hunting leopard from India -- and seven chieftain from Punt with their wives and children. This was the crowning achievement of Hatshepsut's reign which was marked by the peaceful expansion of trade, rebalancing of economy, stabilization of government, and development of art and architecture in Egypt. Those myrrh trees "were planted against the walls in the temple enclosure at Deir el-Bahari in stone pots that had drainage holes in their bases. Now the god could walk with delight in his 'garden of Punt' and Hatshepsut too could walk there with Sennemut [her architect and confidant] and other courtiers, drinking in the fragrance of the perfume-dripping resin. [Native s]ycamore trees were also planted and acacia and persea (the laurel)."
Hatshepsut reigned with three kings and was "king" of Egypt for seventeen years prior to the expedition. She lived for five years after that. Thutmose III, her nephew and third husband, who had not been allowed to rule while she was in charge, became the strongest pharaoh ever to rule Egypt after she died/was murdered. A bold military commander, administrator, statesman, builder, and king, he took credit for the construction of Hatshepsut's beautiful Deir el-Bahari temple when -- twenty years after her death -- he defaced her inscriptions and placed his name over hers on the walls. The places that held her name were carved over with the names of Thutmose III, II, or I. Her name was left in a few places, perhaps by accident. The Punt series of reliefs received little damage, probably because she had not taken an active part in the expedition. However, when the orgy of destruction commanded by the great and long-frustrated Thutmose III was over, almost all of Hatshepsut's images were broken and her name had been chiseled from/covered over on almost all monuments. Even her beloved myrrh trees in the Deir el-Bahari colonnade were uprooted and burned. (Wells, Evelyn Hatshepsut (Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc.; 1969), pp. 70, 108, 123-4, 238, 240, 243, 248, 265, planting quote from pg. 245; other sources state the trees were frankincense; The Marshall Cavendish Illustrated Encyclopedia of Plants and Earth Sciences (Bellmore, NY: Marshall Cavendish Corporation, 1988), Vol. 6, pg. 680, which also has a b&w illustration of bas-relief of the trees (reproduced above left); right-hand image from The Ancient Egypt Site, From A to Z, Punt; cf. Peter Brown's article "The Cultural Background of Bonsai," Bonsai, BCI, Vol. XXX, No. 4, July/August 1991, pg. 14, "Only one tree was lost..."; also, James, Peter and Nick Thorpe Ancient Mysteries (New York: Ballantine Books, 1999), pg. 344; and James and Thorpe Ancient Inventions (New York: Ballantine Books, 1994), pg. 266). Some imply that while these were in the early stages of container plant technology, these undoubtedly were not the first specimens ever dug up and transplanted after being moved a distance, containerized only for the period of transport.) The April 2009 National Geographic cover story, "The She-King of Egypt" by Chip Brown with photographs by Kenneth Garrett, pp. 88-111, is about Hatshepsut. A section in color of a potted myrrh tree is on pg. 42 (same as color above?). Can an approximate age of the trees transplanted be derived from the relative height and size of the specimens? (The text only of the article can be found here.) And then there is this:
|
Again, if you have any answers or corrections or additional questions, please contact rjb@magiminiland.org.com . All who are and will be interested in this international gardening art thank you. |